Writing Tips

Your awesome Tagline

10 notes

“Write What You Know” Does Not Mean What You Think It Does | Fuel Your Writing

writersbane:

((By Icy Sedgwick))

If you’ve ever read anything about writing, chances are that at some stage you’ll have encountered the maxim that you should ‘write what you know’. It’s at this point that some writers will throw up their hands and declare that nothing interesting ever happens to them, so what can they possibly write about? It can also lead you into dangerous territory if you decide to turn real events into fiction – if you don’t disguise your characters well enough, it can land you in hot water with the real life protagonists if they don’t come out of the fiction in a positive light. So how on earth can you navigate this treacherous terrain and write about what you know without upsetting, or boring, anyone?

I’ll let you into a secret.

Writing what you know is not as black-and-white as it first appears. If you’re a receptionist in a busy office, you don’t have to write about the drudgery of admin. If you’re a mechanic, you don’t need to set all of your stories in a garage. What you can do is transpose situations in which you find yourself into fictional settings, regardless of genre!

Take those characters and situations and put them in a different context. Use events from your life as the basis of events for your characters. We’ve all been to weddings and office functions, and we’ve all had a first day at school or in a new job – those are experiences you know but, more importantly, they’re experiences a reader can relate to.

Deeper Implications of ‘Write What You Know’

Don’t take it so literally – I’m pretty sure Tolkien didn’t have to go to Middle Earth, and JK Rowling never went to Hogwarts! The fundamental fact is that what you know is humanity, and how the world works, and human nature is fundamentally the same. While we all have different drives, desire, fears and goals, we have the same basic needs. The setting is just window dressing – as in the first two points, the characters need to be believable, even if they aren’t based in our reality.

Put Everyday People into Unusual Situations

Maybe you see the same people on your daily commute, and you’ve invented back stories for them. You could write a story about bored commuters, with the themes of apathy and ennui in the modern city, but that’s too obvious. Think sideways – those characters could be downtrodden victims of an oppressive state in a post-apocalyptic dystopian tale, or maybe they’re robotic workers in a science fiction adventure.

3438462202_11929b17bd

Maybe you went to a wedding recently, but you don’t want to write about an average twenty-first century wedding. That wedding might have taken place in the sixteenth century, or perhaps it took place in a fantasy setting, attended by warriors and elven priests.

Use Yourself as Your Protagonist

One of the stumbling blocks a lot of new writers face is that of characterisation. Lead characters can appear as composites of well-known characters, or they appear as ‘Mary Sue’ characters, those figures that are too good to be true. A good example of a Mary Sue character would beTwilight’s Bella – instantly popular at a new school, inexplicably attractive to all males and possessed of a special ability that grants her immunity from vampire powers. That makes for adull character.

However, if you use yourself as a basis, you can include character flaws you might not admit to in real life, and you can base your character’s reactions to an event on how you would react in the same position. The character will be more believable because it’s based on a real person – you.

Use a Hobby to Inform Your Writing

If you’re an amateur artist, or you have a passion for 1940s social history, then use them to inform your writing. Lawyers tend to write legal thrillers and medical professionals are more likely to write scientific dramas than chick lit but it doesn’t have to stop at your profession. Interesting or unusual hobbies can be a goldmine of ideas, and if it’s something you know well, then yes, you are writing what you know. If you give your character the same unusual hobby, they’re more likely to stick in a reader’s mind than a character who likes watching TV or chatting over dinner.

Location. Location. Location.

It’s true that a lot of fiction is set in major or famous locations – consider the number of books set in LA, New York, London or even Paris. Even if you’ve never been, you probably know enough from movies to be able to write something set in a generic New York neighbourhood, or involving London’s West End.

How boring.

Why not use an area you know well instead? Perhaps you were raised in a small village, or you currently live in a quirky, bohemian neighbourhood. You can change the names if you want and turn the location into something more inventive, or maybe you want to make the place famous. Other people who live in or know the area will read your story due to the local interest, and those unfamiliar with the place will get a good feel for it – and may even want to visit. Even if you hate the place and expose it warts and all, you’re still writing what you know – which means writing with conviction.

(Source: beatwritersbane)

Filed under writing advice fuel your writing outside link writing writing tips writing process research write what you know write what you know ABOUT

16 notes

50 Idioms About Talking

writersbane:

((by Daniel Scocco))

Last week, I offered a roster of synonyms for talk and talking. This list expands on that theme by offering set phrases about talking and their meaning:

1. Beat (one’s) gums: to speak excessively and aimlessly

2. Bull session: a rambling group conversation

3. Chew the fat: to chat

4. Chew the rag: to chat

5. Diarrhea of the mouth: excessive talking

6. Dish out: to deliver critical comments

7. Flap (one’s) lips: see “beat (one’s) gums”

8. Gift of gab: a propensity for talking

9. (One) likes hear (oneself) talk: said of someone who is egotistical

10. Like talking to a brick wall: said of trying unsuccessfully to persuade or reason with someone

11. Run off at the mouth: see “beat (one’s) gums”

12. Shoot the breeze: to chat

13. Shoot the bull: to chat

14. Shoot the shit: to chat

15. Spill the beans: to divulge information, or to confess (see confess)

16. Speak out of turn: to say something inappropriate

17. Speak the same language: to be in agreement

18. Spit it out: to speak about something one is reluctant to discuss — often used as an imperative

19. Talk a blue streak: to talk quickly and excessively

20. Talk a mile a minute: to speak rapidly

21. Talk around: to avoid (a subject)

22. Talk big: to brag

23. Talk dirty: to try to stimulate someone sexually by speaking provocatively

24. Talk (someone) down: to outdebate someone, guide someone through a difficult maneuver (especially a pilot flying a plane), or to successfully bargain for a better price

25. Talk down to: to speak condescendingly

26. Talk (one’s) ear off: to talk to someone excessively

27. Talk (one’s) head off: to talk excessively

28. Talk in circles: to speak in a confusing or indirect manner

29. Talk in riddles: to speak obscurely or with hints

30. Talk (one) into: to persuade someone

31. Talk on: to continue to speak, or to speak on a certain topic

32. Talk (oneself) out: to speak to the point of exhaustion

33. Talk (one) out of: to dissuade someone

34. Talk out of both sides of (one’s) mouth: to speak inconsistently about something depending on who one is talking to

35. Talk (something) out: to talk about something to reach a consensus or understanding

36. Talk (something) over: see “talk (something) out”

37. Talk sense: to speak reasonably

38. Talk shop: to speak about work-related issues outside the work environment

39. Talk some sense into: to talk to someone to persuade them to see reason

40. Talk the talk: to speak as if one is an authority or adheres to certain beliefs or values

41. Talk the talk and walk the walk: to act in accord with one’s stated beliefs or values

42. Talk through: to talk about something thoroughly to achieve a resolution

43. Talk through one’s hat: to speak insincerely, to talk nonsense, or to exaggerate

44. Talk to hear (one’s) own voice: to talk excessively, in an egotistical manner

45. Talk tough: to speak in an intimidating manner, or to bluster

46. Talk turkey: to speak frankly and/or with resolve

47. Talk until (one) is blue in the face: to speak exhaustively, especially in an unsuccessful effort to persuade

48. Talk (something) up: to promote something to draw attention to it

49. Talk (one’s) way out of: to say something so as to evade blame or avoid responsibility

50: You should talk: an admonition to avoid expressing oneself hypocritically

(Source: beatwritersbane)

Filed under writing advice daily writing tips outside link writing writing tips lit idioms synonyms

13 notes

What Star Wars Teaches Us About Character Introductions

-merewords:

Original article found here.

The following article originally appeared on Jason Black’s blog, Plot to Punctuation. Jason is a book doctor who actively blogs about character development. He writes a monthly column on character development for AuthorMagazine.org, and was a presenter at the 2010 Pacific Northwest Writers Association Summer Writers Conference. To learn more about Jason or read his blog, visit his website at www.PlotToPunctuation.com.

In real life, we make judgments about people, often within mere seconds of meeting them. Those judgments, whether right or wrong, are incredibly difficult to change later on. You don’t, as the saying goes, get a second chance to make a first impression.

The same is true in our books. Scenes where we introduce readers to new characters are tough to do well, because we don’t get much space to play with before readers make up their mind. Not many paragraphs pass before readers decide whether they like, loathe, admire, or pity a new character. So we have to act fast.

Star Wars is a great example of how to do this well, and exhibits most of the core techniques I want to talk about. Star Wars (and I’m talking about Episode IV, here) manages to convey to us, in very short amounts of screen-time, the essential nature of all of its main characters and shows them to be unique, distinctive individuals. We can take some lessons there as to how to effectively introduce our own books’ characters.

Show them in action

When introducing a protagonist or other POV character, consider showing them in action. By this I mean putting the character in a scene where he or she has to actually do something. Make it a situation where the character has to make some kind of choice and take some kind of action (preferably, a difficult choice and an unpleasant action) in order to affect the outcome of the situation.

Early on in Princess Leia’s introduction - it’s not her first scene, but it’s close - she is faced with a no-win choice: give up the location of the rebel base, or see her home planet of Alderaan destroyed. We can see how difficult a choice it is for her, through her visceral, bodily reactions. She’s heartbroken to betray the rebellion, but she can’t let an entire planet’s population be eradicated either. It’s an impossible choice, but she makes a choice anyway, and we see the pain of it in the down-turn of her face, the slump of her shoulders.

What does it tell us about her? It tells us that she’s an important person within the world of the movie. It tells us that she is fundamentally a protective, nurturing person, in as much as she tries to protect the people of Alderaan even though she must make a huge sacrifice in the attempt. The scene portrays her as a deeply sympathetic character. But note - and this is important - the sympathy comes not from the choice itself but from how she feels about it, which we viewers read through her body language. Had she treated the choice differently, in a casual or cavalier manner (“Well, Tarkin, I can’t have you blowing up a whole planet, so hey, the rebels are on Dantooine. Go get ‘em, big guy!”) we’d have had an entirely different feeling about her.

Show them in conflict

One of Luke Skywalker’s first scenes is a minor conflict between him and his Uncle Owen. We meet Luke in the scene where the Jawas sell R2-D2 and C-3PO to Luke’s family. Having made their purchases, Uncle Owen tells Luke to get the new droids cleaned up. Luke replies with:

But I was going into Toshi Station to pick up some power converters…

Epic whine. A whine that will go down in history. But, he obeys his Uncle. What’s going on here from a character perspective? We’re being shown that Luke is a relatively powerless figure. He has no authority, and little control over his life. Physically, we can see that he’s a very young man, so this makes sense and is something most viewers can empathize with. We’ve all felt that way from time to time. That’s the sympathetic hook of Luke’s character. But it also shows us that he’s not satisfied with the life he lives. He rankles at the limitations of both the life he lives and the place he lives it. As he remarks to C-3PO:

Well, if there’s a bright center to the universe, you’re on the planet that it’s farthest from.

Conflict is a wonderful way to bring a character’s deeper motivations up to the surface where we can see them. Whether those motivations come out through dialogue (as they do here), through choices made as the conflict progresses, conflict is a great way to let us know what really drives your characters.

Show them using key skills, attitudes, hobbies, et cetera

We first meet “Old Ben” Kenobi, the “crazy old wizard,” after Luke gets his butt kicked by the Tusken Raiders. (Side note: Luke clearly loses that conflict, which greatly reinforces his powerlessness.) Kenobi comes breezing into the canyon, his brown robes flowing in the breeze, and the raiders all take off. Young, strong, able-bodied Luke was child’s play for the raiders, but creaky old Ben Kenobi scares them off without so much as breaking a sweat.

It’s not difficult to understand that this Kenobi guy must have something going for him. He’s got some kind of mystic juju going on in that scene which is nothing to sneeze at. At that point in the movie, we have no idea what his deal is, not yet, but we get it: he’s a powerful figure. His subsequent dialogue with Luke further reveals him to be both kindly and wise.

In hero’s journey terms (and Star Wars is definitely a hero’s journey story), even in this short introductory scene Kenobi is an obvious fit to be the story’s mentor character.

Use vivid imagery

Don’t discount a vivid set of visuals to introduce a character, either. Like Darth Vader. Even without John William’s unforgettable musical theme for Vader, we know he’s a total badass from the moment he steps into the smoke-filled corridor of Princess Leia’s spacecraft. His imposing physical stature, jet black outfit, and billowing cape all speak of power. The symbology is not subtle at all, but it is pulled off with such panache that the overall impression is powerfully striking.

Show other characters’ reactions

Speaking of Vader, he’s also a great example of how other characters’ reactions can show the viewer (or reader) a more complete picture. He shows his face - well, his mask anyway - and storm-troopers snap to attention along the corridor’s walls. They make room for him to pass. Rebel soldiers avert their eyes and clasp their hands behind their heads. Those reactions, even though they come from nameless (and for the stormtroopers, literally faceless) extras, tell us everything we need to know about Vader. When Vader steps into that corridor, he’s the man. He’s in complete control of the situation, and no one is about to defy him.

Except, getting back to her for a moment, Princess Leia. And what does that tell us about her? That she’s strong, oh so strong, and indomitable.

Make use of setting

Where we meet characters says a lot about them too. We meet Luke out in the middle of nowhere on his Uncle’s moisture farm. He could scarcely be in a less influential setting. It’s a great setup for Luke, because for him Star Wars: A New Hope is a fish-out-of-water story. He’s the backwater nobody who finds himself suddenly thrust into the middle of hugely important, high stakes events. That we meet him in such an inauspicious location, and particularly since the previous scenes involved spaceships and Very Important People, shows us exactly the degree to which Luke is going to be an unlikely hero, bumbling through very much out of his depth.

Han Solo’s introduction is also rich with setting. We meet him in the practically the sleaziest dive bar in the galaxy. That alone sets him up as an unsavory rogue character. We then see him shoot his way out of an encounter with a bounty hunter, and with more than his share of casual bravado, establish that he is as much in control within this environment as Vader was back on Leia’s spaceship. We’re also left with no uncertainty that this Han Solo guy is likely the worst of the possible choices Luke and Ben have at their disposal for getting off Tattooine, except that he’s their only choice. His roguishness, established as much by the setting as his actions, works to sell the desperate circumstances Luke and Ben are in.

Note, too, that this is a perfect introduction for Han Solo in terms of setting up his overall character arc. He flips from being an indifferent mercenary figure to being an active ally to the rebellion. And in later movies, he shows his softer side, his willingness to take risks for those he cares about, and so forth. His arc is all about that shift from being a self-centered opportunist, to a more idealistic supporter of a cause that is larger than himself. For that to work, we have to meet him while he’s still pompous, and the Mos Eisly cantina scene is a great setting to establish that as a starting point for him.

Drop some hints about backstory

The opportunity of meeting a new character is not an excuse to tell us their life’s story. It is not an occasion to indulge in a massive backstory infodump. Don’t go there. Just don’t.

It is, however, an opportunity to create some mystery by hinting at interesting elements of backstory. The opportunity of meeting a new character is to raise some compelling questions in the reader’s mind which you can then explore more fully as the story moves on.

Darth Vader’s physical form hints at significant backstory. From the first second we see him, he is obviously a physically powerful character. And yet, there’s that mechanical, raspy breathing that hints at an underlying frailty. He’s got machines and blinking lights all over his chest. You cannot help but look at him and wonder What’s under the mask? And how did he get to be that way?

When we meet Luke Skywalker, it’s in the context of his aunt and uncle. The dialogue takes particular care to give us their names, Aunt Beru and Uncle Owen. Shortly thereafter, we see that he doesn’t simply work on their farm, he lives with them. The subtext of the conversation where his Uncle refuses to let Luke send in his application to the Academy tells us that they are his caregivers and surrogate parents. So we wonder Why is he living with them? What happened to his real parents? We’re not given some kind of heavy-handed flashback montage showing us what happened to Luke’s parents (we had to wait 20+ years and five more movies to really understand that), but we are given hints that there is a compelling backstory there.

When we meet Obi Wan and come to understand that he isn’t just a crazy old man like Uncle Owen told Luke, that he does have some kind of power, we’re forced to wonder What the heck is he doing living out in the middle of a nowhere desert?

We’re forced to wonder. And because of that curiosity, we’re compelled to keep watching. It works in books, too.

The number-one job of a character introduction

If I can sum all this up, my advice would be this: Craft your character introductions to tell us what’s most important about that person. You don’t get much space before the reader’s first impression is set, so make it count. Concentrate on conveying the one thing you most want us to believe about that character.

And make it something good, because above all, we need a reason to be interested. Give us some reason to love, to hate, to admire, or to pity the character. As long as we feel something about the person, we’ll read on. As long as we’re interested in who they are, we’ll be interested in what happens to them. The second we realize there’s nothing about a character that interests us (usually because the writer has left them too opaque), we lose interest in the story itself.

(Source: fuzzylittle-manpeach)

Filed under writing advice Star Wars Character Introductions

15 notes

How to Avoid 10 Common Conference Mistakes That Most Writers Make | WritersDigest.com

writersbane:

((By Brian A. Klems))

Writers drop precious money—not to mention writing time—on conferences every year, which makes it doubly disturbing that so many of us fall prey to innocent mistakes that can keep us from getting the most out of them. So we asked 10 conference organizers to share the pitfalls they most often see writers tumbling into—and how to avoid them.

#1  APPROACHING EDITORS/AGENTS THE WRONG WAY
“All too often writers don’t use common sense when approaching editors and agents. Some of the errors I’ve seen include following an editor into the restroom and requesting an interview, or approaching an editor or agent who is talking with just one other person. The best way is to approach them when they are not in a session or what seems to be a private conversation. I recommend a social setting or after a conference panel or workshop. Ask if they have time to meet with you. Offer to buy the editor or agent something to drink, then find a place where you can talk briefly without interruption.”
—Candy Moulton, Western Writers of America 
(Bismarck, N.D., westernwriters.org)

#2  HAVING A BAD ATTITUDE
“Don’t come to the conference with an attitude. We’ve seen some writers who seem to feel that the conference is slanted against them. They think others have access to an inside track that’s closed to them, when in reality everyone is treated alike and any limited resources are allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. Also, when meeting with an agent for a consult, do not expect a complete critique of your work. Understand that this is an opportunity for you to present your pitch, and that if the agent finds it interesting, he or she will ask you to send more of your work for review.”
—Jan Whitaker, Write Angles 
(South Hadley, Mass., writeanglesconference.org)

#3  FORGETTING TO DO YOUR HOMEWORK
“Some writers don’t plan ahead. … Match what you want with what is offered by talking to the teachers ahead of time and seeing what is being taught. Conferences have websites and brochures, so basic information is available well ahead of time. A call to the conference organizer is an easy way to get additional information.”
—Dan Smith, Roanoke Regional Writers Conference 
(http://bit.ly/h4rGoX)

#4  NOT KNOWING WHERE YOUR WORK FITS IN
“Every year I ask conference attendees, ‘What genre is this?’ [and] I hear, ‘fiction.’ It’s important to appear professional and prepared: ‘My novel is a supernatural suspense set in the near future. Lisa Conner has moved into a new home in upstate New York. It appears she didn’t move in alone. During her trials, Lisa will face a past she wants to forget, a present she doesn’t trust and a future she can’t imagine. The book runs 90,000 words, is written in third person. …’”
—Alton Gansky, Blue Ridge Moun-tains Christian Writers Conference 
(near Asheville, N.C., brmcwc.com)

#5  FAILING TO DRESS FOR SUCCESS
“Sometimes writers arrive in short sleeves and sandals, without a jacket or sweater. They shiver in the air conditioning, which can get really cold when you’re sitting all day. Conference attendees should always layer so they can be comfortable enough to concentrate on the speakers’ messages. Also, I’ve seen people set down their conference tote bag and, because they all look alike, someone inadvertently picks up the wrong bag—and there go all your carefully recorded notes. Tie a piece of ribbon or attach a silk flower or your favorite sports team logo to the handle, and your bag becomes instantly recognizable.”
—Donna Meredith, The Tallahassee Book Festival and Writers Conference 
(twaonline.org)

#6  OVERLOOKING PITCH-SESSION PREP WORK
“You need to find the agent who is a perfect fit. … Pitching a fantasy manuscript to an agent who works primarily with literary fiction will not bring a writer any closer to publication. Conferences supply speaker bios for a reason. Read them. Old interviews, blogs and podcasts featuring these agents are often readily available online, and agency websites are full of useful information. Writing a book takes dedication, time and thorough research. Choosing the right agent to query or pitch should require the
same consideration.”
—Kris Spisak, James River Writers Conference 
(Richmond, Va., http://bit.ly/m6il3q)

#7  MISSING OPPORTUNITIES TO NETWORK
“The biggest blunder for attendees is not planning ahead and bringing networking items like cards, brochures and books to trade and give away. Too often, attendees don’t interact with each other or the speakers as much as possible. … Writers attend writing conferences for a variety of reasons, but chief among them is to network with editors, agents and fellow writers. Having a card and/or brochure is just one way to build a network of contacts and supporters for your writing.”
—Margaret Walters, Red Clay Writers Conference 
(Kennesaw, Ga., georgiawriters.org)

#8  PLAYING IT TOO SAFE
“You never know who you might meet in line for coffee or while taking a break in the lobby. If you spend all of your time with your [friends], you miss out on a lot of interesting conversations and connections. The best strategy is to challenge yourself to sit down to meals alone, strike up conversations with neighbors while waiting for sessions to begin [and] be open to meeting new people. Catch up with friends after the event is over. …”
—Stephanie Chandler, Nonfiction Writers Conference 
(virtual event, nonfictionwritersconference.com)

#9  FAILING TO FOLLOW UP
“A lot of writers fail to follow up with editors and agents in a timely manner.  … Writers might wait six months after the conference to get back to an editor on an idea, which is much too long. If you get positive feedback, you should follow up about two weeks after the conference. Don’t call just to chat—have a query in mind, maybe something you discussed at the conference.”
—Maren Rudolph, Travel Classics Writers Conferences 
(various locations. travelclassics.com/conferences)

#10  GIVING UP CONTROL
“There are always a few [writers] who use other writers to make themselves feel better by bragging or, worse, by deliberately diminishing the work [of] other people. The second you are feeling belittled, insecure, envious—immediately exit that conversation. Surround yourself only with people whom you find to be genuinely supportive and empathic. ‘We are all in this boat together. How can we support one another?’ should be the motto of everyone at the conference. You want to leave the conference feeling inspired.   … You have control over this!”
—Susan Page, San Miguel Writers’ Conference
(Mexico, sanmiguelwritersconference.org)

(Source: beatwritersbane)

419 notes

A novel is not an allegory…. It is the sensual experience of another world. If you don’t enter that world, hold your breath with the characters and become involved in their destiny, you won’t be able to empathize, and empathy is at the heart of the novel. This is how you read a novel: you inhale the experience. So start breathing.
Azar Nafisi (via doubledaybooks)

(via sonhoedesrazao)

7 notes

“How do I get deep into characters’ heads when I write?” On emotional resonance in writing:

hangedlikeadog:

The lovely endlessdreamer13 submitted this to me a while back, and I finally was able to formulate a response! She wrote:

How do you get so deep into characters heads when you write? I’d love to be able to get that depth but I’m never able to get it. Oneshots are a bit easier for that, but for my novel length stories, well, I feel like I’m hovering around the MCs head. I want my theoretical readers to get that emotional tug when reading.

May I first take a moment to thank you for such an amazing and loaded question? It made me giddy with happiness, and then I got so excited I rambled a bit—sorry in advance! Answer under the cut.

Read More

Notes

Rules for Writing

writingphilosophy:

I never understand how you can teach writing.

Or do a degree purely in Creative Writing.

Unpopular opinion, but I find it genuinely unfathomable.

As for ‘writing rules’…I can’t work that out either, because everyone is different. Here are my general strategies.

1. Spell things correctly.

2. Proofread and edit a lot.

3. Don’t be overdramatic.

4. Show, don’t tell.
Although sometimes you need to tell a little bit. Show first, though. I think it’s almost like writing an essay. You have a point in mind, you use events/plot/whatever to show this point, then after you explain it - but only a little; don’t hammer it home because it’s annoying.

5. Research everything but allow for imagination too.

6. Grammar grammar grammar.

7. Peaks and troughs, guys.
The landscape of a storyline is not the Netherlands for three hundred and forty-five pages and then Ben Nevis for the last ten. I suppose this, again, is quite a personal stylistic trait, but the way I think of an outline is this:

Set-up - Lalala, stuff - something happens causing conflict which begins leading to TENSION which is then resolved (kind of) but leaves a lasting trace, ready to ignite next time, which will be worse. I read somewhere that novels should never have one climax and then that’s it, finished. I definitely agree but again, it probably depends on the type of novel/writer. Also, I wouldn’t recommend this for short stories.

8. Don’t use ‘smiled’ as a way of describing speech. You can’t smile words.

e.g. ‘I’m amazing,’ she smiled. [NO!]

‘I’m amazing.’ She smiled, and did something else probably, because it’s crying out for another stage direction, but I’m not sure what it was and I don’t care either.

9. Don’t over-use the thesaurus.
Wow, well done, I like how you’ve managed to fit the words ‘animadvert’ and ‘cogitate’ into the same sentence. Oh, and the next sentence is excellent too: I see you found so many wonderful synonyms for ‘good’. Unfortunately your sentence structures have collapsed around such a complex lexicon and I think I have a headache. It’s a little like adding salt to your food: use them sparingly, and don’t bombard us with them. Also, if you find a word you like, be careful not to repeat it all the time (I’m guilty of this one).

10. He said, she said. But then he MUMBLED and she AGONIZED so he RESPONDED and she DECLARED and then we all went to bed with another headache.

The jury still seems to be out regarding said vs. not said. Apparently it’s bad writing not to use twenty different words instead. Personally, I like to use it once and then not use any speech directions after that. I belong to the ‘it should be bloody obvious/it’s supposed to be ambiguous school.’

e.g. ‘You’re a prat.’ She threw a metal box at him.

Yup, she’s mad, then.

or

‘You’re a prat.’ She smiled across at him.

Oh, no she isn’t, she’s taking the piss.

Also adverbs: again, a lot of people hate them, but used sparingly, I think they are fine.

Happy McWriting.

[NB: why do I always use examples where women are throwing things at men? Or angry with them? Every single time! Why?]

10 notes

The Secret Language Code

thefamiliarstrange:

This has to do with writing in a roundabout way. 

You can’t help but marvel at the fact that we are all bombarded by words from women and men every day of our lives and most of us have never “heard” these sex differences in language. Part of the problem is that our brains aren’t wired to listen to pronouns, articles, prepositions, and other “junk” words. When we listen to another person, we typically focus on what they are saying rather than how they are saying it.

It might be interesting to take this information and look at your characters’ language.

Filed under writing advice writing writing philosophy

11 notes

Help With Characters: Personality Tests

thefamiliarstrange:

I’ve been reworking some of my characters in my latest w.i.p., and I came across this website with a few dozen personality tests.  I think they could be useful for fleshing out character personalities—just answer as you think your character would.

So, I’m interested to know: Do you personally start a project with a character in mind, building the plot around them?  Do you being with the plot, and add characters to act it out?  Or are you somewhere in between?

Filed under writing advice writing characters psychology